Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley stands by her decision to reject a ballot proposal to repeal the state’s 2011 casino legislation. (Image: AP Photo/Elise Amendola)
Opponents of casino gambling in Massachusetts have actually been war that is waging the expansion on every battlefront possible. They’ve had wins and losings across the continuing state, however they’ve always made their case. Now, they’re hoping that the highest court in Massachusetts gives them one final possiblity to put the issue before voters.
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court heard arguments week that is last the question of whether a measure to repeal the 2011 casino law can appear on the statewide ballot in November. The move would create a referendum essentially on whether gambling enterprises could be built one that could disrupt the process also if it was to ultimately fail.
State Believes Implied Contracts Could Be Violated By Repeal
That disruption was one of the main arguments made by lawyers for the state, including Attorney General Martha Coakley, who rejected the petition because she felt it had been unconstitutional. According to Coakley, such a repeal would damage the ‘implied contracts’ between casino license applicants and the state gambling payment. She argued that those contract rights would be illegally removed with no compensation for the casino firms.
Coakley made remarks at a break fast forum in Boston that fu (más…)